If you have seen a bigfoot or believe you have ongoing activity in your area that is bigfoot related, please complete our Report Form to report your sighting.
Bob Strain, Chair
Brian Brown, Vice Chair
Jerry Riedel, Secretary
Kathy Strain, Treasurer
Lynda Wilkinson, Sgt.
Tom Yamarone, Director
Don Stockton, Director
Dave Osborne, Director
Sean Forker, Director
Billy Willard, Director
Home Members options Forums Search Web Organization Links Other Forums Website Links Internet Radio Shows Blogs
 Welcome Anonymous
Membership:
 Latest: Blakever
 New Today: 0
 New Yesterday: 0
 Overall: 746
People Online:
 Members: 0
 Visitors: 2
 Total: 2
Who Is Where: Visitors:01: News and Reports
02: Home
Staff Online:No staff members are online!
image courtesy of Paul Willison
Let's Talk Bigfoot is a archived Internet radio show endorsed by AIBR.
On each episode are the Who's Who of bigfoot research.

blubrry.com
Have you ever seen a Bigfoot?
|
|
|
Beliefs and Experiences with Sasquatch and Corresponding Coping Strategies |
|
|
|
by Mark Banta
Abstract
This study looked at three groups of people: those with high confidence in the existence of sasquatch, those with medium confidence, and those with low confidence. Each participant completed a coping strategy inventory that determined whether their preferred coping style was problem solving, social-support seeking, or avoidance. In this study, there were no significant differences between the three groups' average scores on a preferred coping strategy. This suggests that a high belief or reported experience with sasquatch is not related to an avoidance of reality or escape-type behavior. An example of an avoidant coping strategy is fantasizing about better times or identifying with characters on television and getting lost in their reality. Interestingly, such a relationship has been found in research on paranormal believers, but the researcher in this area is quite thin and lacks empirical support. The one significant finding in this study was a relationship between income level and avoidance. On average, the lower the income level that was reported, the higher the score was on avoidance. This suggests that those with low income are more likely to use avoidant strategies to deal with problems and stress. This finding is not strongly backed by research and has received little attention from academia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How Reliable are Sasquatch Databases? |
|
|
|
How Reliable are Sasquatch Databases?
A Review of Literature on Witness Interviewing
By Mark Banta
When investigating a reported sasquatch sighting, a researcher interviews the witness and forms an opinion on whether they feel the witness is being truthful or not. Most research groups depend on this opinion in making a determination on whether or not to add the sighting to a database and/or release it to the public. The obvious question in this scenario is: how accurate is this researcher’s opinion? If the researcher can determine with a high level of accuracy the validity of the claim, then the database may well provide information germane to the field of sasquatch research. However, if the level of accuracy falls more in the realm of chance, the database becomes highly corrupted and of little value.
|
|
|
|
Posted by
Paul.Vella
on
Tuesday, January 01, 2008 (10:38:58)
(236 reads) Read More... | 26495 bytes more |  | Score: 3.66
|
|
|
|
Protocol: Nests and Bedding Areas |
|
|
|
Kathy Moskowitz Strain
Nests and bedding areas are very rare. Generally, they are considered to be temporary living locations. Several types of Sasquatch sleeping or resting locations have been described. These include beds, nests (both roofed and unroofed), and dens. Nests are defined as constructed structures, usually consisting of sticks and/or branches with a soft lining (usually moss). Several examples are given from various places, including a nest from southern Oregon that was lined with fern fronds. The nest was described as “soft, springy, and well-engineered. A second nest found in British Columbia had branches woven in and around the outside of the nest. A partial-roof nest from Knight Inlet was described as a “bower”, consisting of bent, broken, and over-arching branches. A bedding site in the Blue Mountains, only fifty yards from a gravel road, consisted of broken branches laid out in a layer, eight feet long by four feet wide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research Note: Comments regarding the identity of a hand of unknown origin |
|
|
|
Research Note: Comments regarding the identity of a hand of unknown origin
by Alton Higgins, 14 July 2006.
As reported by Laura Michaels on 13 June 2006, Bigfoot researcher Tom Biscardi announced that he possessed what he believed was a Bigfoot hand. Photos and additional information pertaining to the hand were later released and widely discussed (see these two Cryptomundo articles and Bigfoot Forums).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Wild Man” Images in European Art |
|
|
|
by Pearl Jo Prihoda
Editor's Note: As recently discussed in my own article, What's In an Image?, Humans had a need to depict the world around them in their artwork. Bigfoot, or in this case ‘Wild Man,’ was important enough to European's during the 14-19th century, that images of hairy humans (male or female) made their way into texts, cloth, stained glass windows, alters, cathedral ceilings and doorways, and sculptures. The ‘Wild Man’ was significant enough to everyday life that it was necessary to represent even the Virgin Mary and Mary Magdalen as hairy women of the woods. Below is a small collection of images, information, and web locations of the some European ‘Wild Man’ art gathered by Ms. Prihoda. Please enjoy! Kathy Strain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dmitri Donskoy: Biomechanical Analysis of the 1967 Patterson Film |
|
|
|
Introduction to the Familiar Version
Here is the familiar version of Donskoy’s paper; nearly identical versions have appeared in the books of Peter Byrne and Hunter/Dahinden. I’ve made a half-dozen small changes to make the text smoother and more idiomatic, which have been approved by the article’s translator, Dmitri Bayanov. I’ve copy-edited this text into a better-organized version that follows this one.
Contrary to the supercilious and uninformed opinion of David Daegling (Bigfoot Exposed, p. 111), there is only one other (complete) version of this paper online—or there was until recently, when it disappeared for some reason. Nor was Donskoy a “ringleader” at the Institute of Hominolgy—instead, he was uninvolved in the topic until approached by Bayanov.
—Roger Knights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What’s in an Image? |
|
|
|
Kathy Moskowitz Strain
Humans have occupied North America for at least 15,000 years, having migrated across the Bering Land Bridge from Asia during a period of low sea levels. Land animals also moved in both directions across the bridge. For example, we know based on fossil remains that many animal species, such as camelids, evolved in North America and crossed into Asia. Asian mammals also crossed to North America, but many of them, such as lions and cheetahs, later became extinct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orangutan cultures |
|
|
|
Universität Zürich, Anthropological Institute & Museum
Possible Cultural Variants [of Orangutans]
The [following] list [of observed Orangutan behaviors] is based on the experience of many field workers in different sites and is meant to give ideas. ALWAYS describe the locally observed variant in detail, and try to get video footage whenever possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bigfoot Put to the Test |
|
|
|
by Roger Knights
On Oct. 31, 2003 the first—and apparently last—episode of a new series appeared on The Learning Channel: “Monsters Put to the Test.” Its aim was to debunk cryptid sightings by showing how witnesses to hoaxed situations tend to report seeing what they were “primed” to see, or what they picked up by “contagion” from witnesses around them. In the main example, residents of a small town were primed to believe that a lake monster lurked in the Suwanee River nearby after a quack “cryptozoologist” canvassed them about recent sightings there. (Something Stephen Foster forgot to mention in his song!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daegling's Scheme Test |
|
|
|
by Roger Knights
On Oct. 23, 2005 Bigfootforums.com poster “croquemitaine” started a thread at www.bigfootforums.com/...13157&st=0 titled “Daegling’s Errments,” in which he accused skeptical anthropology professor David Daegling, author of “Bigfoot’s Screen Test” in the May/June 1999 issue of Skeptical Inquirer, of a flub: (mis)takenly using a measurement of the shoulder breadth instead of chest breadth. He pointed out that Daegling’s 19.5″ back measurement is close to the average male’s shoulder breadth. Actually, Daegling did use a measurement across the back—but it was an improper one. I.e., he committed a less egregious error. However, in addition to this “blunder,” Daegling also committed a “crime”—to give the old expression a new twist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|